Herrera v. State

570 So. 2d 1129, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9275, 1990 WL 198305
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1990·No. No. 89-2242·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No error is shown whatsoever in the appellant’s convictions for second-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, unlawful display of a firearm, and shooting into an occupied vehicle. We agree with appellant, however, that none of the stated reasons were valid grounds for departure from the sentencing guidelines: (1) emotional trauma to the surviving victims, see State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1987); (2) unreasonable risk of injury to others on a public street, see Bulger v. State, 537 So.2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); or (3) obtaining new identification documents after commission of the offenses, See Patten v. State, 531 So.2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

The convictions are affirmed; the sentences are vacated and the case remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrera v. State, 570 So. 2d 1129, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9275, 1990 WL 198305 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

570 So. 2d 1129 (Herrera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herrera v. State
627 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)