Herrera v. State
This text of 621 So. 2d 1094 (Herrera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon examination of the record and consideration of the state’s confession of error, the denial of Oscar Herrera’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion as untimely, is reversed. Pursuant to Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992), appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief is deemed filed by December 24, 1992, four days prior to the expiration of the two-year period which began to run upon the issuance of the mandate in appellant’s direct appeal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(b).
Accordingly, the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
621 So. 2d 1094, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8358, 1993 WL 302348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrera-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.