Herrera v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEFFREY E. HERRERA, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-1946 Petitioner : (JUDGE MANNION) Vv. : WARDEN ORZEN, : Respondent :

JEFFREY E. HERRERA., : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-1947 Petitioner : (JUDGE MANNION) V. : PA BD. OF PROB AND PAROLE, : Respondent : ORDER In accordance with this Court’s memorandum issued this same day, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The petitions for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) are DISMISSED. 2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c).' 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE these cases. | 2S TTT 1 Jurists of reason would not debate the procedural or substantive disposition of the Petitioner's claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 ‘2()00). Therefore, no certificate of ajopezalability will be grartec. See id.

4. Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 15) is DISMISSED as moot. Jif E. MANNION United States District Judge DATE: Aprilay 2023 22-1946-01

-2-