Hernandez v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 19, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-07775·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMAURYSHERNANDEZ, Petitioner, 23 CIVIL 7775 -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. wenn eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 18, 2024, the Court has adopted the Report and Recommendation, and, for the reasons therein, the petition is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 2 8 U.S. C. § 2253. Moreover, the Court certifies that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, as petitioner's claim lacks any arguable basis in law or fact, and therefore permission to proceed in forma pauperis is also denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Dated: New York, New York September 19, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court | BY: HK MaANGe DeputyClerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Hernandez v. United States (Hernandez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)