Hernandez v. State
959 So. 2d 438, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10940, 2007 WL 2010837
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 884 So. 2d 281 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Robinson v. State, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D1245, — So.2d -, 2007 WL 1372658 (Fla. 5th DCA May 11, 2007) (“[T]o be preserved for appeal, the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that will not be heard on appeal.”); Huck v. State, 881 So.2d 1137, 1144-45 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (affirming where defendant’s purportedly reasonable, uncontroverted hypotheses of innocence were unreasonable and conflicted with evidence presented by State).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hernandez v. State, 959 So. 2d 438, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10940, 2007 WL 2010837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
959 So. 2d 438 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huck v. State
881 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Robinson v. State
963 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)