Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hernandez v. State

890 So. 2d 1275, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 330, 2005 WL 119612

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 2005

DocketNo. 5D04-1494

StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 1275 (Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. State, 890 So. 2d 1275, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 330, 2005 WL 119612 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Alexis Hernandez appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Finding no error, we affirm.

In his motion, Hernandez alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for not advising him that his parole might be revoked as a consequence of entering a plea of no contest to reckless driving. During the hearing on the motion, Hernandez’s attorney testified that she had advised [1276]*1276Hernandez of the consequences of the plea and that his parole might be revoked. The trial court found counsel’s testimony to be credible. Having reviewed the file and the order entered by the trial court, we find no error. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

Alexis Hernandez appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Finding no error, we affirm.

In his motion, Hernandez alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for not advising him that his parole might be revoked as a consequence of entering a plea of no contest to reckless driving. During the hearing on the motion, Hernandez’s attorney testified that she had advised [1276]*1276Hernandez of the consequences of the plea and that his parole might be revoked. The trial court found counsel’s testimony to be credible. Having reviewed the file and the order entered by the trial court, we find no error. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

890 So. 2d 1275, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 330, 2005 WL 119612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack