Hernandez v. Robertson
16 F.2d 279, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1926·No. No. 2531·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We are unable to agree with the appellant that there was any error in the conclusion announced in the successive decisions of the Primary Examiner of the Patent Office, of the Board of Examiners in Chief, of the Commissioner of Patents, of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (298 F. 1019, 54 App. D. C. 404), and of the District Court for the District of Maryland (16 F.[2d] 276).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hernandez v. Robertson, 16 F.2d 279, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836 (4th Cir. 1926).
16 F.2d 279 (Hernandez v. Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Robertson
25 F.2d 833 (Fourth Circuit, 1928)