Hernandez v. Robertson

Fourth Circuit

Hernandez v. Robertson

16 F.2d 279, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 30, 1926

DocketNo. 2531

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 F.2d 279 (Hernandez v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. Robertson, 16 F.2d 279, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836 (4th Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

We are unable to agree with the appellant that there was any error in the conclusion announced in the successive decisions of the Primary Examiner of the Patent Office, of the Board of Examiners in Chief, of the Commissioner of Patents, of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (298 F. 1019, 54 App. D. C. 404), and of the District Court for the District of Maryland (16 F.[2d] 276).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

We are unable to agree with the appellant that there was any error in the conclusion announced in the successive decisions of the Primary Examiner of the Patent Office, of the Board of Examiners in Chief, of the Commissioner of Patents, of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (298 F. 1019, 54 App. D. C. 404), and of the District Court for the District of Maryland (16 F.[2d] 276).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.2d 279, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-robertson-ca4-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack