Burke v. Monumental Division No. 52, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

Fourth Circuit

Burke v. Monumental Division No. 52, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

298 F. 1019, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2745

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 1924·No. No. 2177·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think the decree in this ease is right, and it is affirmed, on the following authorities: Otto v. Tailors’ B. & P. Union, 75 Cal. 308, 17 Pac. 217, 7 Am. St. Rep. 156 and note; Society, etc., v. Commonwealth, 52 Pa. 125, 91 Am. Dec. 139; Maxwell v. Theatrical Mech. Ass’n, 54 Misc. Rep. 619, 104 N. Y. Supp. 815; Dewar v. Minneapolis Lodge, No. 44, B. P. O. E., 155 Minn. 98, 192 N. W. 358; Del Ponte v. Societa Italiana, 27 R. I. 1, 60 Atl. 237, 70 L. R. A. 188, 114 Am. St. Rep. 17; 25 R. C. L. 55; 5 C. J. 1354. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think the decree in this ease is right, and it is affirmed, on the following authorities: Otto v. Tailors’ B. & P. Union, 75 Cal. 308, 17 Pac. 217, 7 Am. St. Rep. 156 and note; Society, etc., v. Commonwealth, 52 Pa. 125, 91 Am. Dec. 139; Maxwell v. Theatrical Mech. Ass’n, 54 Misc. Rep. 619, 104 N. Y. Supp. 815; Dewar v. Minneapolis Lodge, No. 44, B. P. O. E., 155 Minn. 98, 192 N. W. 358; Del Ponte v. Societa Italiana, 27 R. I. 1, 60 Atl. 237, 70 L. R. A. 188, 114 Am. St. Rep. 17; 25 R. C. L. 55; 5 C. J. 1354. Affirmed.

Burke v. Monumental Division No. 52, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 298 F. 1019, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2745 (4th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

298 F. 1019 (Burke v. Monumental Division No. 52, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related