Hernandez v. Landrum

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hernandez v. Landrum

168 So. 3d 354, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10957, 2015 WL 4429176

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 2015

DocketNo. 1D14-4059

StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 3d 354 (Hernandez v. Landrum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. Landrum, 168 So. 3d 354, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10957, 2015 WL 4429176 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court issued an order on June 11, 2015, directing Appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him in light of his having instituted, pro se, repetitive meritless proceedings in this court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); § 944.279, Fla. Stat.

Having shown no legal basis to refrain from the imposition of sanctions, Appellant is hereby prohibited from continuing as a [355]*355litigant in any cases pending in this court, and from filing any future pleadings in this court, unless represented by a member of the Florida Bar in good standing. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). Additionally, pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes, we direct the clerk of the court to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate facility in the Department of Corrections for possible disciplinary action against Appellant.

AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.

THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court issued an order on June 11, 2015, directing Appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him in light of his having instituted, pro se, repetitive meritless proceedings in this court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); § 944.279, Fla. Stat.

Having shown no legal basis to refrain from the imposition of sanctions, Appellant is hereby prohibited from continuing as a [355]*355litigant in any cases pending in this court, and from filing any future pleadings in this court, unless represented by a member of the Florida Bar in good standing. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). Additionally, pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes, we direct the clerk of the court to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate facility in the Department of Corrections for possible disciplinary action against Appellant.

AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.

THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 3d 354, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10957, 2015 WL 4429176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-landrum-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack