Hernandez v. Landrum
114 So. 3d 1050, 2013 WL 2395084, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8768
This text of 114 So. 3d 1050 (Hernandez v. Landrum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hernandez v. Landrum, 114 So. 3d 1050, 2013 WL 2395084, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8768 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
Because petitioner has failed to show that he has brought the pending pleading to the attention of the circuit court or made an express and distinct demand for performance, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Thomas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 74 So.3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Al-Hakim v. State
783 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Thomas v. State, Department of Revenue
74 So. 3d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 1050, 2013 WL 2395084, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-landrum-fladistctapp-2013.