Hernandez v. Kylm

Opinion

1 2 U.S. F DIL ISE TD R I IN C TT H CE O URT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 Jun 10, 2024 4 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 10 BRYAN PAUL HERNANDEZ, No. 2:24-CV-00138-SAB 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 13 14 ARTHUR D. KYLM, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a civil detainee1 proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action filed purportedly under “diversity of citizenship.” ECF No. 1. 19 Plaintiff is currently housed at the Eastern State Hospital (“ESH”) and complains 20 that Defendant Arthur D. Kylm, a Benton County Superior Court Commissioner, 21 did not appoint him counsel in a “guardian of the person case” that Plaintiff is 22 seeking to terminate. Id. at 1. 23 Plaintiff has presented no facts from which the Court could infer that he and 24 Commissioner Kylm are citizens of different states, or that any amount in 25

26 1 In a separate habeas corpus proceeding, Hernandez v. Carpenter, No. 2:24-cv- 27 00009-SAB, Bryan Paul Hernandez clarified that he has no criminal convictions 28 and is challenging a civil commitment. Id., ECF No. 8. controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to force Commissioner Kylm to appoint counsel for Plaintiff in a state court action, as well as the appointment of counsel in this case. Plaintiff makes no claim for damages, let alone at the level of the statutory amount. 5 Furthermore, to the extent Plaintiff is asking this Court to intervene in an ongoing state guardianship proceeding pending before the Benton County Superior Court, this Court must abstain under the doctrine set forth in Younger v. Harris, U.S. 37 (1971). See e.g., Disability Rts. New York v. New York, 916 F.3d 129, 9)| 136 (2d Cir. 2019) (observing that “states have an especially strong interest” in “state court procedure in guardianship proceedings” and abstaining under Younger). 12 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED this action is DISMISSED without 13|| prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ' 1332. 14 DATED this 10th day of June 2024. 15 16 17 18 bya Sectha Stanley A. Bastian Chief United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA