Hernandez v. City of Hoover

990 So. 2d 398, 2007 WL 4277590
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided December 7, 2007·No. 2060794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(E), Ala. R.App. P.; Ernst Young, LLP v. Tucker, 940 So.2d 269, 284 (Ala. 2006);Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala. 2000);Matthews v. Alabama Agric. Mech. Univ.,787 So.2d 691 (Ala. 2000); Smith v. Union Bank Trust Co.,653 So.2d 933, 934 (Ala. 1995); Lott v. Toomey,477 So.2d 316, 319 (Ala. 1985); and Thurmond v. City ofHuntsville, 904 So.2d 314, 319 (Ala.Civ.App. 2004).

PITTMAN, BRYAN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

THOMPSON, P.J., dissents, with writing.

*Page 399

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. City of Hoover, 990 So. 2d 398, 2007 WL 4277590 (Ala. Ct. App. 2007).

990 So. 2d 398 (Hernandez v. City of Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. City of Hoover
990 So. 2d 398 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)