Herman v. Sunset Commercial Bank

481 So. 2d 98, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 164, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11472
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 1986
Docket85-773
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 481 So. 2d 98 (Herman v. Sunset Commercial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herman v. Sunset Commercial Bank, 481 So. 2d 98, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 164, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11472 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

481 So.2d 98 (1986)

Dennis A. HERMAN, Appellant,
v.
SUNSET COMMERCIAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 85-773.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 7, 1986.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick, Strickroot and A. Rodger Traynor, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel and Kendall B. Coffey and Stevan J. Pardo, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order which denied defendant's motion to dismiss and quash service of process on authority of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070 and Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 2185, 85 L.Ed.2d 528, 544-45 (1985). As a basis for long-arm jurisdiction, a pleading which alleges only that

Defendant ... is ... subject to the Court's personal jurisdiction for having failed to make payment in Florida as guarantor of a note in default, and thereby failing to perform acts required by the guaranty contract to be performed in this state....

is constitutionally infirm. See also Edwards v. Geosource, Inc., 473 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (signing of promissory note as guarantors of obligations of Florida corporation insufficient minimum contacts to subject non-resident shareholders of corporation to jurisdiction of Florida court).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferenchak v. Zormati
S.D. Florida, 2021
deMCO TECHNO., INC. v. CC ENGINEERED CASTINGS, INC.
769 So. 2d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Laser Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. CES Indus., Inc.
573 So. 2d 1081 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Sorokwasz v. Kaiser
549 So. 2d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Pellerito Foods, Inc. v. American Conveyors Corp.
542 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Gilbert v. Herne
544 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
DeMetra Hontzas v. Kaufman, Rossin & Co.
513 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Pacific Tel. and Tel. Co. v. Geist
505 So. 2d 1388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 So. 2d 98, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 164, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-sunset-commercial-bank-fladistctapp-1986.