Herman v. Harborcreek Township

321 A.2d 653, 458 Pa. 202, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 708
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1974·No. Appeal, 145·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The decree of the court below, sustaining in part and overruling in part appellant’s preliminary objections to appellees’ complaint in equity, is neither a final decree which “terminates the litigation between the parties to the suit by precluding a party from further action in that court”, James Banda, Inc. v. Virginia Manor Apartments, Inc., 451 Pa. 408, 410, 303 A. 2d 925 (1973) [quoting from Stadler v. Mt. Oliver Borough, 373 Pa. 316, 318, 95 A.2d 776 (1953)], nor an interlocutory decree on a question of jurisdiction made appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. §672, *203 Miller Estate v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 477, 227 A.2d 679 (1967). The decree is, therefore, not appealable, and the appeal therefrom must be quashed.

It is so ordered. Costs on appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herman v. Harborcreek Township, 321 A.2d 653, 458 Pa. 202, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 708 (Pa. 1974).

321 A.2d 653 (Herman v. Harborcreek Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suburban East Tires, Inc. v. Duquesne Light Co.
448 A.2d 638 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Bracken v. Bracken
439 A.2d 1247 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Giannini v. Foy
421 A.2d 338 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Fred Lowenschuss Associates v. DePallo
418 A.2d 411 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
In Re Petition of Jones
346 A.2d 260 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)