Herman v. Harborcreek Township
This text of 321 A.2d 653 (Herman v. Harborcreek Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The decree of the court below, sustaining in part and overruling in part appellant’s preliminary objections to appellees’ complaint in equity, is neither a final decree which “terminates the litigation between the parties to the suit by precluding a party from further action in that court”, James Banda, Inc. v. Virginia Manor Apartments, Inc., 451 Pa. 408, 410, 303 A. 2d 925 (1973) [quoting from Stadler v. Mt. Oliver Borough, 373 Pa. 316, 318, 95 A.2d 776 (1953)], nor an interlocutory decree on a question of jurisdiction made appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. §672, *203 Miller Estate v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 477, 227 A.2d 679 (1967). The decree is, therefore, not appealable, and the appeal therefrom must be quashed.
It is so ordered. Costs on appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 A.2d 653, 458 Pa. 202, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-harborcreek-township-pa-1974.