Herman H. Sticht Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 669
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herman H. Sticht Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 480
United States Customs Court·Decided May 29, 1957·No. Reap. Dec. 8815; Entry No. 843205, etc.·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, plaintiff submitted said cases on the record consisting of the official papers.

A review thereof discloses nothing which would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise the subject of said appeals are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herman H. Sticht Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 669 (cusc 1957).

38 Cust. Ct. 669 (Herman H. Sticht Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.