Herman H. Sticht & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Herman H. Sticht & Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 480

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 24, 1957

DocketNo. 60687; protests 216836-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 480 (Herman H. Sticht & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herman H. Sticht & Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 480 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of John P. Ilerber & Co., Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of John P. Ilerber & Co., Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cust. Ct. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-h-sticht-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack