Herdling v. Commissioner
This text of 16 B.T.A. 100 (Herdling v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION.
The facts in this proceeding and the question involved are identical with the facts and the question in the case of Edwin H. Gibb, 10 B. T. A. 1373. On the authority of the decision in that case the issue here must be resolved in favor of the respond[101]*101ent. See, also, Charles Colip, 5 B. T. A. 123; F. William Morf, 6 B. T. A. 309; Simon L. Steefel, 8 B. T. A. 1111; F. Maurice Griesheimer, 7 B. T. A. 1225; C. A. Weaver, 5 B. T. A. 313; Fred McJunkin, 6 B. T. A. 425, and Melvin Behrends, 6 B. T. A. 524.
Judgment will he entered for the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 B.T.A. 100, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herdling-v-commissioner-bta-1929.