Herdling v. Commissioner

16 B.T.A. 100, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2642
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided April 22, 1929·No. Docket No. 26553.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION.

MaRquette:

The facts in this proceeding and the question involved are identical with the facts and the question in the case of Edwin H. Gibb, 10 B. T. A. 1373. On the authority of the decision in that case the issue here must be resolved in favor of the respond[101] ent. See, also, Charles Colip, 5 B. T. A. 123; F. William Morf, 6 B. T. A. 309; Simon L. Steefel, 8 B. T. A. 1111; F. Maurice Griesheimer, 7 B. T. A. 1225; C. A. Weaver, 5 B. T. A. 313; Fred McJunkin, 6 B. T. A. 425, and Melvin Behrends, 6 B. T. A. 524.

Judgment will he entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herdling v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 100, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2642 (bta 1929).

16 B.T.A. 100 (Herdling v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herdling v. Commissioner
16 B.T.A. 100 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1929)