Herbert Eck v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Martin M. Karlan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cosimo Perrucci v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 202 F.2d 750 (Herbert Eck v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Martin M. Karlan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cosimo Perrucci v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
202 F.2d 750
53-1 USTC P 9287
Herbert ECK, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Martin M. KARLAN, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Cosimo PERRUCCI, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Nos. 148, 149, 150.
Docket 22290, 22291, 22292.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 10, 1953.
Decided April 1, 1953.
Charles Gadd, New York City, Milton Gould, New York City, of counsel, for petitioners.
H. Brian Holland, Ast. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack and S. Dee Hanson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The decisions are affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court, 16 T.C. 511, and on the authority of Middleton v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 200 F.2d 94.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 F.2d 750, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 441, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-eck-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-martin-m-karlan-v-ca2-1953.