Herb Hallman Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 23, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-00447·Unknown

Opinion

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH E. KAEMPFER CROWELL LYON, II Robert McCoy, No. 9121 Kenneth E. Lyon, II, No. 7071 Sihomara L. Graves, No. 13239 432 Court Street 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 700 Reno, Nevada 89501 Reno, Nevada 89501 Telephone: (775) 786-4188 Telephone: (775) 852-3900 Facsimile: (775) 786-5573 Facsimile: (775) 327-2011 Email: ken@lyonlaw.net Email: rmccoy@kcnvlaw.com Email: sgraves@kcnvlaw.com BASS SOX MERCER Richard M. Sox (pro hac vice) SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Nicholas A. Bader (pro hac vice) James C. McGrath (pro hac vice) Jeremiah Hawkes (pro hac vice) William F. Benson (pro hac vice) 2822 Remington Green Circle Seaport East Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Two Seaport Lane, Suite 1200 Telephone: (850) 878-6404 Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Facsimile: (850) 942-4869 Telephone: (617) 946-4800 Email: rsox @dealerlawyer.com Facsimile: (617) 946-4801 Email: nbader@dealerlawyer.com Email: jcmcgrath @seyfarth.com Email: jhawkes @dealerlawyer.com Email: wbenson @seyfarth.com 1] Attorneys for Plaintiff Herb Hallman Attorneys for Defendant General Chevrolet, Inc. Motors LLC |} HERB HALLMAN CHEVROLET, INC. | Case No. 3:22-cv-00447-MMD-CLB d.b.a. CHAMPION CHEVROLET, Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE VS. ORDER ON CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS GENERAL MOTORS LLC, Defendant. WHEREAS, to facilitate the production and receipt of information during discovery in the above-captioned litigation (the “Litigation”), the parties agree and stipulate, through their respective counsel, to the entry of the following Protective Order (the “Order’’) for the protection of Confidential and Highly

Confidential Materials (as defined herein) that may be produced or otherwise disclosed during the course of this Litigation by or on behalf of any party or non- party. The Court has been fully advised in the premises and has found good cause for its entry. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the terms and conditions of this Order shall govern the handling of discovery materials in the Litigation: 1. Applicability of Order: This Order will be applicable to and govern the handling of documents, depositions, deposition exhibits, deposition videos, interrogatory responses, responses to subpoenas, responses to requests for /admissions, responses to requests for production of documents, and all other discovery obtained pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by or from, or produced on behalf of a party in connection with the Litigation (this information hereinafter referred to as “Discovery Material’’). This Order does not restrict or limit the use of any Confidential or Highly Confidential Material introduced in evidence at trial. Nothing in this Order, however, shall prevent any Party from seeking an appropriate protective order to govern the use of Confidential Discovery Material at trial. 2. Definitions: As used herein, “Producing Party” or “Disclosing Party” shall refer to the parties in this Litigation that give testimony or produce documents or other information, as well as non-parties that provide documents or testimony in response to a subpoena, and “Designating Party” shall refer to parties whose Confidential and Highly Confidential information is disclosed in documents produced by other parties or third parties, in which case the affected party may designate such information as Confidential or Highly Confidential under this Order.

“Receiving Party” shall refer to the parties in this Litigation that receive such /information. “Authorized Recipient” shall refer to any person or entity authorized by Sections 11 and 12 of this Order to obtain access to Confidential Material, Highly A || Confidential Material, or the contents of such Material. 3. Designation of Material: Any party may designate Discovery Material that is in its possession, custody, or control to be produced to a Receiving Party, or Discovery Material that is produced by another party (including a third party) but qualifies for protection under this Order, as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” under the terms of this Order if the party in good faith reasonably believes that such Discovery Material contains non-public, confidential material as defined in Sections 4 and 5 below (hereinafter “Confidential Material” or “Highly Confidential Material”). 4. Confidential Material: For purposes of this Order, Confidential Material is any information that a party believes in good faith to be confidential or sensitive information, including, but not limited to, trade secrets, research, design, development, financial, technical, marketing, planning, private or confidential personal information, customer information, or commercial information, as such terms are used in Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable case law interpreting Rule 26(c)(1)(G) or the former Rule 26(c)(7). 5. Highly Confidential Material: For purposes of this Order, Highly Confidential Material is any Protected Data (defined below) and/or Confidential Material as defined in Section 4 which also includes non-public product design and testing information or extremely sensitive, highly confidential, non- public information, consisting either of trade secrets or proprietary or other highly

confidential business, dealer, financial, regulatory, or strategic information C(including information regarding business plans, technical data, and non-public designs), the disclosure of which would create a substantial risk of competitive or business injury to the Producing or Designating Party. Certain Protected Data may compel alternative or additional protections beyond those afforded Highly Confidential Material, in which event the parties shall meet and confer in good faith, \\and, if unsuccessful, shall move the Court for appropriate relief. 6. Protected Data: Protected Data shall refer to any information that a party believes in good faith to be subject to federal, state, or foreign Data Protection Laws or other privacy obligations. Protected Data constitutes highly sensitive materials requiring special protection. Designating material as Protected Data does not preclude the parties from designating that same material, as appropriate, for Confidentiality and Privilege. 7. Designating Confidential Material, Highly Confidential Material, or Protected Data: The designation of Discovery Material as Confidential Material, Highly Confidential Material, or Protected Data for purposes of this Order shall be made in the following manner: a. Documents: The parties shall stamp or otherwise clearly label each page of a designated document as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” if feasible to do so. However, failure to do so shall not be considered a waiver of such designation, and shall not deem such information to not qualify as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential.” A party who disagrees with another party's designation must nevertheless abide by that designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herb Hallman Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors LLC, (D. Nev. 2023).

Herb Hallman Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors LLC (Herb Hallman Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)