Heon v. Vose, Jr.

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

May 24, 1996

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                                 ____________________


No. 95-2137



                               FREDERICK M. HEON, JR.,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                             GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND



                       [Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________



                                 ____________________



            Frederick M. Heon, Jr. on brief pro se.
            ______________________

            Michael B.  Grant, Senior Legal  Counsel, Rhode Island  Department
            _________________

        of Corrections, on brief for appellees.


____________________


____________________


Per  Curiam.     Frederick   Heon,   Jr.,  who   is
                      ___________



incarcerated at the Adult Correctional  Institutions in Rhode



            Island, appeals  from the  district court's dismissal  of his



            civil  rights suit  under 42  U.S.C.    1983 against  various



            state  prison officials.    We affirm  substantially for  the



            reasons given in the magistrate judge's report dated July 12,



            1995,  which the district court adopted as its decision.  See
                                                                      ___



            also  Dominique v. Weld,  73 F.3d 1156  (1st Cir. 1996).   We
            ____  _________    ____



            have considered Heon's claims of error, but find none of them



            persuasive.



                      Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.
                      ____________________________


-2-