Henson v. State
This text of 15 So. 2d 339 (Henson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, being confined in jail charged by two separate indictments with the-offense of murder in the first degree, filed his petition of habeas corpus, seeking to be allowed bail. The petition was denied in the lower court, and from the order and judgment, pronounced and entered, he appealed to this court.
After a full, careful and attentive consideration of all the facts and circumstances disclosed by the record in this case, the court sitting en banc, we are of the opinion, and so hold, that under the prevailing and oft announced rule governing the questions presented, the order appealed from should not be disturbed.
As to the principal insistence of petitioner on this appeal, we may merely refer to the case of Daughdrill v. State, 113 Ala. 7, 21 So. 378, (11th headnote). See also page 32 of 113 Ala., 21 So. 378, of said opinion.
No elaboration is deemed necessary.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 So. 2d 339, 31 Ala. App. 296, 1943 Ala. App. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henson-v-state-alactapp-1943.