Hensel v. Witt
This text of 113 N.W. 1093 (Hensel v. Witt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is conceded, as the fact is, that if Trayser was not able, as the court found, to make title to the property as he agreed, the direction of the verdict is right. We see no escape from the trial court’s conclusion that respondent was never afforded an opportunity to acquire a good title to such property. Counsel for appellant seems to see no way of escape from such conclusion, as to the east side of the building, except upon the theory that the easement was extinguished by adverse possession. The claim in that regard seems wholly untenable since the occupants of the store from first to last recognized the existence of such easement. It is elementary that possession of land in subordination to the rights of others therein for any length of time will not affect such rights. It does not disseize the true owner, and so does not have any element of adverse possession.
By the Gourt. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 N.W. 1093, 134 Wis. 55, 1907 Wisc. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hensel-v-witt-wis-1907.