Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 347
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Cust. Ct. 11 →
United States Customs Court·Decided February 21, 1961·No. No. 65185; protests 256972-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pile ribbons made of synthetic textile similar in use to pile ribbons, wholly or in chief value of silk, and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 347 (cusc 1961).
46 Cust. Ct. 347 (Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Steinberg Bros.
47 C.C.P.A. 47 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1959)