Henry's Estate
53 Pa. Super. 57, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 27, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 3·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We are of opinion that the orphans’ court correctly held that, according to the doctrine of the later cases, particularly Mulliken v. Earnshaw, 209 Pa. 226, the remainders created by the will of John Henry, deceased, were contingent, and, therefore, that the decree of April 1, 1911, was improvidently entered. The decree vacating it, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of the orphans’ court. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry's Estate, 53 Pa. Super. 57, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).
53 Pa. Super. 57 (Henry's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rickenbach Estate
34 A.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Whitaker's Estate
35 Pa. D. & C. 40 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1939)
Harrar's Estate
91 A. 503 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)