Henry's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Henry's Estate

53 Pa. Super. 57, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 27, 1913

DocketAppeal, No. 3

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 53 Pa. Super. 57 (Henry's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry's Estate, 53 Pa. Super. 57, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the orphans’ court correctly held that, according to the doctrine of the later cases, particularly Mulliken v. Earnshaw, 209 Pa. 226, the remainders created by the will of John Henry, deceased, were contingent, and, therefore, that the decree of April 1, 1911, was improvidently entered. The decree vacating it, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of the orphans’ court. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the orphans’ court correctly held that, according to the doctrine of the later cases, particularly Mulliken v. Earnshaw, 209 Pa. 226, the remainders created by the will of John Henry, deceased, were contingent, and, therefore, that the decree of April 1, 1911, was improvidently entered. The decree vacating it, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of the orphans’ court. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Pa. Super. 57, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henrys-estate-pasuperct-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack