Henry v. Williams
This text of Henry v. Williams (Henry v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:25-CV-291-D
RONALD A. HENRY, ) Plaintiff, V. ORDER FRANK BLAIR WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. ;
The court has reviewed plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order [D.E. 5] under the governing standard. See, e.g., Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery Cnty., 722 F.3d 184, 188 (4th Cir. 2013) (en banc); Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. FEC, 575 F.3d 342, 346 (4th Cir. 2009), vacated on other grounds, 559 U.S. 1089 (2010), reissued in relevant part, 607 F.3d 355 (4th Cir. 2010) (per curiam); Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp. Sec., 76 F. Supp. 3d 620, 628 (E.D.N.C. 2014), aff'd, 599 F. App’x 517 (4th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (unpublished). The court DENIES as meritless plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order [D.E. 5]. SO ORDERED. This 4 day of June, 2025.
es United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-williams-nced-2025.