Henry v. Williams
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:25-CV-291-D
RONALD A. HENRY, ) Plaintiff, V. ORDER FRANK BLAIR WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. ;
The court has reviewed plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order [D.E. 5] under the governing standard. See, e.g., Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery Cnty., 722 F.3d 184, 188 (4th Cir. 2013) (en banc); Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. FEC, 575 F.3d 342, 346 (4th Cir. 2009), vacated on other grounds, 559 U.S. 1089 (2010), reissued in relevant part, 607 F.3d 355 (4th Cir. 2010) (per curiam); Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp. Sec., 76 F. Supp. 3d 620, 628 (E.D.N.C. 2014), aff'd, 599 F. App’x 517 (4th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (unpublished). The court DENIES as meritless plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order [D.E. 5]. SO ORDERED. This 4 day of June, 2025.
es United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry v. Williams (Henry v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.