Henry v. State

1913 OK CR 178, 131 P. 1099, 9 Okla. Crim. 715, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Okla. Crim. 369
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 15, 1913·No. No. A-1499.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Wm. Henry, was convicted in the district court of Canadian county of the crime of grand larceny, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years imprisonment in ' the state penitentiary. The judgment and sentence was entered June 1st, 1911. An appeal was perfected by filing in this court November 25th, 1911, a petition in error with case-made.

*716 No briefs have been filed, and when the case was called, on the regular assignment, this term, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error.

The attorney general has filed a motion to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

Where no briefs have been filed, or oral argument made, we do not consider it the duty of this court to make an examination of the transcript of the testimony to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the information, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we find no prejudicial error. The motion to affirm is sustained, and the judgment of the district court of Canadian county is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. State, 1913 OK CR 178, 131 P. 1099, 9 Okla. Crim. 715, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

1913 OK CR 178 (Henry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.