Henry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Henry v. State

1913 OK CR 178, 131 P. 1099, 9 Okla. Crim. 715, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 15, 1913

DocketNo. A-1499.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 178 (Henry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry v. State, 1913 OK CR 178, 131 P. 1099, 9 Okla. Crim. 715, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Wm. Henry, was convicted in the district court of Canadian county of the crime of grand larceny, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years imprisonment in ' the state penitentiary. The judgment and sentence was entered June 1st, 1911. An appeal was perfected by filing in this court November 25th, 1911, a petition in error with case-made.

*716 No briefs have been filed, and when the case was called, on the regular assignment, this term, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error.

The attorney general has filed a motion to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

Where no briefs have been filed, or oral argument made, we do not consider it the duty of this court to make an examination of the transcript of the testimony to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the information, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we find no prejudicial error. The motion to affirm is sustained, and the judgment of the district court of Canadian county is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Wm. Henry, was convicted in the district court of Canadian county of the crime of grand larceny, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years imprisonment in ' the state penitentiary. The judgment and sentence was entered June 1st, 1911. An appeal was perfected by filing in this court November 25th, 1911, a petition in error with case-made.

*716 No briefs have been filed, and when the case was called, on the regular assignment, this term, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error.

The attorney general has filed a motion to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

Where no briefs have been filed, or oral argument made, we do not consider it the duty of this court to make an examination of the transcript of the testimony to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the information, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we find no prejudicial error. The motion to affirm is sustained, and the judgment of the district court of Canadian county is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 178, 131 P. 1099, 9 Okla. Crim. 715, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.