Henry v. State of Louisiana
This text of Henry v. State of Louisiana (Henry v. State of Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-30770 Document: 27-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED March 14, 2024 No. 23-30770 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________
Spencer Will Henry,
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
State of Louisiana; Jeff Landry, Attorney General,
Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:23-CV-547 ______________________________
Before Willett, Duncan, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Spencer Will Henry, Louisiana prisoner # 344747, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). We review the dismissal de novo. Legate v. Livingston, 822 F.3d 207, 209-10 (5th Cir. 2016).
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-30770 Document: 27-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2024
No. 23-30770
Henry has abandoned, by failure to brief, any challenge to the dismissal of his complaint. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). In any event, the district court did not err in concluding that his claims, which asserted that his conviction and confinement based on a non- unanimous jury verdict violated his constitutional rights, were not properly brought under § 1983 and could be brought only in a habeas proceeding. See Poree v. Collins, 866 F.3d 235, 243 (5th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. The dismissal of Henry’s complaint counts as a strike under § 1915(g). See Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 534 (2015). Henry is WARNED that, if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. § 1915(g).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry v. State of Louisiana, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-state-of-louisiana-ca5-2024.