Henry v. Henry
Opinions
Under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, a judge of the superior court of this state may enforce the “duty of support” as defined in Part 1, Sec[212]*212tion 2, Paragraph 6 of said Act (Ga. L. 1958, pp. 34, 35; Code Ann. § 99-903a) as follows: “ ‘Duty of support’ includes any duty of support imposed or imposable by law, or by any court order, decree or judgment, whether interlocutory or final, whether incidental to a proceeding for divorce, judicial (legal) separation, separate maintenance, or otherwise, . . .” Accordingly, where, as in the present case, a judge of the superior court in this state, on the ground that he had no authority under the statute to enter it, revoked a previous order entered by him requiring payment of support by a resident of this state to a former wife, resident of another state, which previous order was based upon a divorce decree providing support for said former wife rendered in this state, such a revocation was error. The fact that she was no longer his wife is immaterial under these circumstances.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
154 S.E.2d 298 (Henry v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.