Henry R. Witte v. Martin J. Ferber, Sheriff of the County of Bergen, State of New Jersey

219 F.2d 113, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2888
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 1955
Docket11359_1
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 219 F.2d 113 (Henry R. Witte v. Martin J. Ferber, Sheriff of the County of Bergen, State of New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry R. Witte v. Martin J. Ferber, Sheriff of the County of Bergen, State of New Jersey, 219 F.2d 113, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2888 (3d Cir. 1955).

Opinion

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of the District of New Jersey denying a writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner was convicted under Revised Statutes of New Jersey 2:103-1, now N.J.S. 2A:85-1, N.J.S.A., for non-feasance in his office as Chief of Police of the Borough of Lodi in the County of Bergen, New Jersey. He was sentenced to a term of six months and fined $1,000.

While the case was before this court for consideration the petitioner completed his sentence and was released from custody. Thereupon the Deputy Attorney General of New Jersey moved that the appeal be dismissed as “moot”.

Counsel for petitioner resists this motion with the interesting proposition that the additional disability of losing his pension payments has been suffered by the petitioner as a result of the conviction, and that therefore a justiciable controversy exists.

Unfortunately for the petitioner we cannot proceed to a determination of his challenging contention because his release from custody compels us to dismiss his appeal, since it is well-settled that in habeas corpus proceedings “without restraint of liberty, the writ will not issue.” McNally v. Hill, 1934, 293 U.S. 131, 138, 55 S.Ct. 24, 27, 79 L.Ed. 238. But compare United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 74 S.Ct. 247, 98 L.Ed. 248, discussing the broader scope of coram nobis proceedings.

For the reasons above stated the appeal will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Ex Rel. Rivera v. Reeves
246 F. Supp. 599 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Green v. Yeager
223 F. Supp. 544 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
Díaz Díaz v. Cándida Campos de Córdova
81 P.R. 975 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1960)
White v. Gladden
303 P.2d 226 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 113, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-r-witte-v-martin-j-ferber-sheriff-of-the-county-of-bergen-state-ca3-1955.