Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company

234 U.S. 749
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 13, 1914
Docket1000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 234 U.S. 749 (Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, 234 U.S. 749 (1914).

Opinion

234 U.S. 749

34 S.Ct. 674

58 L.Ed. 1576

HENRY E. MEEKER, Surviving Partner, etc., Petitioner,
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 1000.

HENRY E. MEEKER, Petitioner,

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 1001.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 13, 1914

Mr. Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., for petitioner.

No counsel appeared for respondent.

Per Curiam:

Petitions granted, upon the authority of § 262 of the Judicial Code [36 Stat. at L. 1162, chap. 231, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1911, p. 235]. Re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, 462, 41 L. ed. 782, 788, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 385; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 50 L. ed. 963, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268, 54 L. ed. 762, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 501; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463, 467, 58 L. ed.——, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 392.

Mr. Joseph W. Folk and Mr. C. W. Needham, by leave of court, filed a brief herein in behalf of the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 U.S. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-e-meeker-surviving-partner-etc-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-company-scotus-1914.