City of Lewiston v. Chamberlain
234 U.S. 751, 34 S. Ct. 775, 58 L. Ed. 1576, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 966
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 118; Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Lewiston v. Chamberlain, 234 U.S. 751, 34 S. Ct. 775, 58 L. Ed. 1576, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 966 (1914).
234 U.S. 751 (City of Lewiston v. Chamberlain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rowen & Blair Electric Co. v. Flushing Operating Corp.
239 N.W.2d 633 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Vulcanite Roofing Co. v. Commonwealth S. S. Co.
284 F. 439 (Fourth Circuit, 1922)
Missouri ex rel. St. Joseph Water Co. v. City of Seattle
235 U.S. 694 (Supreme Court, 1914)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Poetker
235 U.S. 683 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Trocon
235 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
234 U.S. 749 (Supreme Court, 1914)