Henry Amador v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 21, 2014·No. 14-14-00579-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted and Order filed October 21, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00579-CR ____________

HENRY AMADOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1390567

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Counsel has filed a motion requesting appellant be afforded an opportunity to review the record and requesting an extension of time to file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 176th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before November 5, 2014; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry Amador v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Henry Amador v. State (Henry Amador v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)