Henry Amador v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 9, 2014·No. 14-14-00579-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed December 4, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00579-CR ____________

HENRY AMADOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1390567

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel certified to this court that he provided appellant with a copy of the Anders brief and advised appellant of his right to file a pro se brief in response. The appellate record has also been provided to appellant. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief in response to counsel’s Anders brief, appellant’s pro se brief shall be due on or before January 5, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry Amador v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Henry Amador v. State (Henry Amador v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)