Henry A. Swan and Peggy Ann Swan v. Estate of Robert Roseman Monette by Ollie Monette, Administratrix

400 F.2d 274, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5789
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 14, 1968·No. 18921·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from an order sustaining defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint. The issue raised is whether the fact that the decedent carried a policy of liability insurance on his automobile excuses plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the Arkansas non-claims statute in pursuing their cause of action against decedent’s estate. Arkansas has no direct action statute which could cover the situation herein. We hold, on the basis of a carefully considered and thorough opinion of the District Court, the Honorable John E. Miller, that the noncompliance is not excused and we affirm this appeal on the basis of that opinion. Swan v. Estate of Monette, D.C.Ark., 1967, 265 F.Supp. 362.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry A. Swan and Peggy Ann Swan v. Estate of Robert Roseman Monette by Ollie Monette, Administratrix, 400 F.2d 274, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5789 (8th Cir. 1968).

400 F.2d 274 (Henry A. Swan and Peggy Ann Swan v. Estate of Robert Roseman Monette by Ollie Monette, Administratrix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wong v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
820 F.3d 922 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
Jarboe v. Shelter Insurance
877 S.W.2d 930 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Ivory v. Fitzpatrick
445 So. 2d 262 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
Taylor v. Federal Kemper Insurance
534 F. Supp. 196 (W.D. Arkansas, 1982)
Lopez v. Waldrum
460 S.W.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)
Lopez v. Waldrum Estate
460 S.W.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)