Henry A. Swan and Peggy Ann Swan v. Estate of Robert Roseman Monette by Ollie Monette, Administratrix

Eighth Circuit

Henry A. Swan and Peggy Ann Swan v. Estate of Robert Roseman Monette by Ollie Monette, Administratrix

400 F.2d 274, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5789

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 1968

Docket18921

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 400 F.2d 274 (Henry A. Swan and Peggy Ann Swan v. Estate of Robert Roseman Monette by Ollie Monette, Administratrix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry A. Swan and Peggy Ann Swan v. Estate of Robert Roseman Monette by Ollie Monette, Administratrix, 400 F.2d 274, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5789 (8th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from an order sustaining defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint. The issue raised is whether the fact that the decedent carried a policy of liability insurance on his automobile excuses plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the Arkansas non-claims statute in pursuing their cause of action against decedent’s estate. Arkansas has no direct action statute which could cover the situation herein. We hold, on the basis of a carefully considered and thorough opinion of the District Court, the Honorable John E. Miller, that the noncompliance is not excused and we affirm this appeal on the basis of that opinion. Swan v. Estate of Monette, D.C.Ark., 1967, 265 F.Supp. 362.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from an order sustaining defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint. The issue raised is whether the fact that the decedent carried a policy of liability insurance on his automobile excuses plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the Arkansas non-claims statute in pursuing their cause of action against decedent’s estate. Arkansas has no direct action statute which could cover the situation herein. We hold, on the basis of a carefully considered and thorough opinion of the District Court, the Honorable John E. Miller, that the noncompliance is not excused and we affirm this appeal on the basis of that opinion. Swan v. Estate of Monette, D.C.Ark., 1967, 265 F.Supp. 362.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

400 F.2d 274, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-a-swan-and-peggy-ann-swan-v-estate-of-robert-roseman-monette-by-ca8-1968.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack