Henley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Henley v. State

313 S.E.2d 788, 169 Ga. App. 597, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1643

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 31, 1984

Docket66850

StatusPublished

This text of 313 S.E.2d 788 (Henley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henley v. State, 313 S.E.2d 788, 169 Ga. App. 597, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1643 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

Thomas Bruce Henley brings this appeal from his conviction of unauthorized possession of a weapon by an inmate in a penal institution, OCGA § 42-5-63 (Code Ann. § 77-361). His sole enumeration of error attacks that portion of the testimony of the administrative assistant to the warden at Georgia State Prison which recited appellant’s several criminal convictions and the sentences he received therefor. Pretermitting the question of whether this testimony was relevant and probative to a prosecution under OCGA § 42-5-63 (Code Ann. § 77-361), the record here discloses no objection at trial to this testimony. Therefore, this enumeration of error presents no ground for reversal. See Ridley v. State, 141 Ga. App. 854 (1) (234 SE2d 688) (1977); see also Fain v. State, 165 Ga. App. 188 (2) (300 SE2d 197) (1983).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur. Richard S. Thompson, for appellant. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, Claude M. Kicklighter, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope, Judge.

Thomas Bruce Henley brings this appeal from his conviction of unauthorized possession of a weapon by an inmate in a penal institution, OCGA § 42-5-63 (Code Ann. § 77-361). His sole enumeration of error attacks that portion of the testimony of the administrative assistant to the warden at Georgia State Prison which recited appellant’s several criminal convictions and the sentences he received therefor. Pretermitting the question of whether this testimony was relevant and probative to a prosecution under OCGA § 42-5-63 (Code Ann. § 77-361), the record here discloses no objection at trial to this testimony. Therefore, this enumeration of error presents no ground for reversal. See Ridley v. State, 141 Ga. App. 854 (1) (234 SE2d 688) (1977); see also Fain v. State, 165 Ga. App. 188 (2) (300 SE2d 197) (1983).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur. Richard S. Thompson, for appellant. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, Claude M. Kicklighter, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 S.E.2d 788, 169 Ga. App. 597, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henley-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack