Hendrix v. State

139 S.E. 101, 37 Ga. App. 166, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 557
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1927·No. 18287·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. “The decision of every issue of fact is exclusively for the jury.” Davis v. Kirkland, 1 Ga. App. 5 (1) (58 S. E. 209). “No principle of law is founded upon better reason or has been more strictly adhered to by this court than that the jury are the proper judges of the weight and sufficiency of testimony and of the credibility of witnesses, and this court will not disturb the verdict of a jury where there is evidence to support its findings. Stricklin v. Crawley, 1 Ga. App. 139 (58 S. E. 215); Charles v. Brooker, 1 Ga. App. 219 (58 S. E. 218); Daughtry v. S. & S. Ry. Co., 1 Ga. App. 393 (58 S. E. 230).” Unity Cotton Mills v. Hasty, 19 Ga. App. 590 (2) (91 S. E. 915).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendrix v. State, 139 S.E. 101, 37 Ga. App. 166, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 557 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

139 S.E. 101 (Hendrix v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jolly v. State
145 S.E. 525 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)