Hendrix v. Pirkle

69 S.E.2d 267, 208 Ga. 751, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 336
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 13, 1952·No. 17712·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

“A demurrer to an original petition does not, without more, cover the petition after it has been amended in material respects, but in such case the demurrer should be renewed if it is still relied on.” Livingston v. Barnett, 193 Ga. 640 (19 S. E. 2d, 385); Hughes v. Purcell, 198 Ga. 666 (32 S. E. 2d, 392); Peoples Loan Co. v. Allen, 199 Ga. 537 (34 S. E. 2d, 811); Silverman v. Alday, 200 Ga. 711 (38 S. E. 2d, 419); Howard v. Lee, 208 Ga. 735. Accordingly, the present exceptions to the rulings on demurrer do not present any question for decision; and, no other questions being presented, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendrix v. Pirkle, 69 S.E.2d 267, 208 Ga. 751, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 336 (Ga. 1952).

69 S.E.2d 267 (Hendrix v. Pirkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruce v. Roberts
133 S.E.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Lewis v. Gay
109 S.E.2d 268 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Whitley v. Williams
108 S.E.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Davidson v. Consolidated Quarries Corp.
108 S.E.2d 495 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Mack v. Mack
100 S.E.2d 732 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Cain v. Phillips
89 S.E.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Irwin v. Young
87 S.E.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)