Cain v. Phillips
This text of 89 S.E.2d 163 (Cain v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A demurrer to a petition, or motion to dismiss in the nature of a demurrer, does not, without more, cover the petition after it has been amended in material respects, but in such case the demurrer or motion to dismiss should be renewed if it is still relied on. Livingston v. Barnett, 193 Ga. 640 (19 S. E. 2d 385); Hughes v. Purcell, 198 Ga. 666 (32 S. E. 2d 392).
2. Where, as here, a petition, to which a demurrer or motion to dismiss in the nature of a demurrer has been filed, is thereafter amended in material respects, and such demurrer or motion is not renewed to the petition as thus amended, such demurrer or motion to dismiss becomes extinct or nugatory (Holliday v. Pope, 205 Ga. 301, 308, 53 S. E. 2d 350), and an exception to the overruling thereof presents no question for decision by this court. Howard v. Lee, 208 Ga. 735 (69 S. E. 2d 263); Hendrix v. Pirkle, 208 Ga. 751 (69 S. E. 2d 267). Accordingly, the exceptions to the rulings on demurrers or motions to dismiss do not present any question for decision, and the judgment of the trial court must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E.2d 163, 211 Ga. 806, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 473, 38 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cain-v-phillips-ga-1955.