Hendricks v. McMaster

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hendricks v. McMaster. Read the opinion of the Court — 390 F. App'x 282
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2010·No. 10-6193·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6193

LARRY EDWARD HENDRICKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HENRY MCMASTER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-01924-DCN)

Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 11, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Edward Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Edward Hendricks appeals the district court’s

orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying Hendricks’ petition for a writ of audita querela and

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Hendricks v. McMaster, No. 3:09-

cv-01924-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2009; Jan. 14, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendricks v. McMaster, (4th Cir. 2010).

Hendricks v. McMaster (Hendricks v. McMaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.