Hendricks v. McMaster

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 11, 2010
Docket10-6193
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hendricks v. McMaster (Hendricks v. McMaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. McMaster, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6193

LARRY EDWARD HENDRICKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HENRY MCMASTER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-01924-DCN)

Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 11, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Edward Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Edward Hendricks appeals the district court’s

orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying Hendricks’ petition for a writ of audita querela and

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Hendricks v. McMaster, No. 3:09-

cv-01924-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2009; Jan. 14, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hendricks v. McMaster, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-mcmaster-ca4-2010.