Henderson v. . Stuart
This text of 18 S.E.2d 705 (Henderson v. . Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful perusal of the record and exceptions filed in this case do not show any reversible error. The obligation of the plaintiffs was joint and several and the coplaintiff, Jonah Henderson, had the right, with the consent and approval of the owner and holder of the secured notes, to divert a portion of the proceeds received from the fire insurance company to the payment of other indebtedness. Turlington v. Lucas, 186 N. C., 283, 119 S. E., 366; Winchester-Simmons Co. v. Cutler, 194 N. C., 698, 140 S. E., 622.
In the judgment of the court below we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 S.E.2d 705, 221 N.C. 37, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-stuart-nc-1942.