Henderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Henderson v. State

860 S.W.2d 396, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1399, 1993 WL 335381

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 1993·No. No. 62684·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Fred Henderson, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

The judgement of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgement is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Fred Henderson, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

The judgement of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgement is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Henderson v. State, 860 S.W.2d 396, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1399, 1993 WL 335381 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

860 S.W.2d 396 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.