Henderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Henderson v. State

811 S.W.2d 68, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 1991 WL 113998

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 488 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 1991·No. No. 59148·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion.

Movant pled guilty to two counts of selling cocaine and one count of possession of phencyclidine. Pursuant to a plea agreement, he received concurrent sentences of 10, 10, and 7 years.

In his Rule 24.035 motion, movant alleges he received ineffective assistance of counsel. His allegations are refuted by the statements he made at the time he entered his pleas of guilty.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion.

Movant pled guilty to two counts of selling cocaine and one count of possession of phencyclidine. Pursuant to a plea agreement, he received concurrent sentences of 10, 10, and 7 years.

In his Rule 24.035 motion, movant alleges he received ineffective assistance of counsel. His allegations are refuted by the statements he made at the time he entered his pleas of guilty.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Henderson v. State, 811 S.W.2d 68, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 1991 WL 113998 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

811 S.W.2d 68 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.