Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.

236 P. 244, 65 Utah 240, 1925 Utah LEXIS 50
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Utah 241
Utah Supreme Court·Decided April 14, 1925·No. No. 4202.·Published

Opinion

FRICK, J.

*241 While the parties to this proceeding are not all the same that were parties to the preceding case just decided, 65 Utah 241, (236 P. 239), yet the facts are the same, and arose out of the same transactions there in question. The cases were heard together in the court below and also in this court. The facts which controlled the decision in that case likewise must control the decision in this one.

In view of the foregoing, and upon the authority of that case, the judgment in this case should be affirmed, with costs to respondents. Such is the order.

GIDEON, C. J., and THURMAN, CHERRY, .and STRAUP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co., 236 P. 244, 65 Utah 240, 1925 Utah LEXIS 50 (Utah 1925).

236 P. 244 (Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.
236 P. 244 (Utah Supreme Court, 1925)