Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.
This text of 236 P. 244 (Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*241 While the parties to this proceeding are not all the same that were parties to the preceding case just decided, 65 Utah 241, (236 P. 239), yet the facts are the same, and arose out of the same transactions there in question. The cases were heard together in the court below and also in this court. The facts which controlled the decision in that case likewise must control the decision in this one.
In view of the foregoing, and upon the authority of that case, the judgment in this case should be affirmed, with costs to respondents. Such is the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 P. 244, 65 Utah 240, 1925 Utah LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-johnson-v-sugar-co-utah-1925.