Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corp. v. Sechko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corp. v. Sechko

227 A.D. 668

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Nassau county denying motion of defendant Nicholas Sechko to dismiss complaint and to vacate undertaking affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mr. Hyman Bushel, the attorney who appeared in the action for defendant Sechko and served said defendant’s answer, was appointed a city magistrate. No other attorney has been substituted. No action can be taken until there is a substitution of attorneys. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 240.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Nassau county denying motion of defendant Nicholas Sechko to dismiss complaint and to vacate undertaking affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mr. Hyman Bushel, the attorney who appeared in the action for defendant Sechko and served said defendant’s answer, was appointed a city magistrate. No other attorney has been substituted. No action can be taken until there is a substitution of attorneys. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 240.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corp. v. Sechko, 227 A.D. 668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

227 A.D. 668 (Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corp. v. Sechko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related