Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corp. v. Sechko
This text of 227 A.D. 668 (Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corp. v. Sechko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Nassau county denying motion of defendant Nicholas Sechko to dismiss complaint and to vacate undertaking affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mr. Hyman Bushel, the attorney who appeared in the action for defendant Sechko and served said defendant’s answer, was appointed a city magistrate. No other attorney has been substituted. No action can be taken until there is a substitution of attorneys. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 240.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 A.D. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hempstead-harbor-lumber-corp-v-sechko-nyappdiv-1929.