HELTZ, MARY T. v. BARRATT, BRUCE S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

HELTZ, MARY T. v. BARRATT, BRUCE S.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 2014

DocketCA 13-01102

StatusPublished

This text of HELTZ, MARY T. v. BARRATT, BRUCE S. (HELTZ, MARY T. v. BARRATT, BRUCE S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HELTZ, MARY T. v. BARRATT, BRUCE S., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

185 CA 13-01102 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

MARY T. HELTZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRUCE S. BARRATT AND ERIE LOGISTICS, LLC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

PERSONIUS MELBER LLP, BUFFALO (SCOTT R. HAPEMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BARTH SULLIVAN BEHR, BUFFALO (ANDREW J. KOWALEWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered March 26, 2013 in a personal injury action. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to reargue and renew her opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Heltz v Barratt ([appeal No. 1]___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 21, 2014]).

Entered: March 28, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI