Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Helmrich v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Helmrich v. Eli Lilly & Co.

88 A.D.2d 766, 451 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17017
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 14, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 766 (Helmrich v. Eli Lilly & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helmrich v. Eli Lilly & Co., 88 A.D.2d 766, 451 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Tenney, J. (see, also, Matter of Steinhardt v JohnsManville Corp., 54 NY2d 1008). In addition, even if we were to hold that the time within which an action must be commenced is computed from plaintiff’s actual or imputed discovery of the DES cancer, her action would still be barred by CPLR 203 (subd [f]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helmrich v. Eli Lilly & Co.
89 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.2d 766, 451 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helmrich-v-eli-lilly-co-nyappdiv-1982.